Foreign-Trained Doctors by Country
The US has more foreign-trained doctors than any other country in raw numbers, which gets read as the US relying on international physicians more than anywhere else. The share data says the opposite: several countries lean on international recruitment far more heavily. Here’s what the numbers actually show, and why the US ends up with the largest count anyway.
| Country | Foreign-trained doctors | Foreign-born doctors |
|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇱 Israel | 57.8% | — |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | ~31.4% | 54.3% |
| 🇳🇿 New Zealand | 42.1% | — |
| 🇳🇴 Norway | 42.1% | — |
| 🇮🇪 Ireland | 40.5% | — |
| 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | ~36% | 40.6% |
| 🇨🇦 Canada | 24.6% | 37.1% |
| 🇺🇸 United States | ~31% | 29.7% |
| 🇩🇪 Germany | ~15% | 21.6% |
“Foreign-trained” = medical degree earned outside the country of practice. “Foreign-born” = physician born outside the country of practice (can include people trained domestically). Figures compiled from OECD’s International Migration Outlook 2025 and OECD foreign-trained-doctor statistics; US and UK foreign-trained figures are the latest OECD has published (2016 data). Percentages are independently sourced per country and aren’t from a single identical survey year, so treat them as directional, not decimal-precise.
Why the US has the most, not the highest share
The US has the largest number of foreign-trained doctors of any country in the world, but that’s a function of scale, not an unusually high reliance on international recruitment. The OECD notes the US “recruited just 33 foreign-trained doctors for every 100 new medical graduates,” well below the rate of 200+ in some peer countries that lean much harder on international hiring to fill shortages.
- Market size. The US has over a million practicing physicians. Even a below-average foreign-trained share still produces more foreign-trained doctors in absolute terms than 100% of a smaller country’s entire physician workforce.
- Pay. US physician compensation significantly exceeds the UK, Canada, and most of Europe, making it a strong draw for anyone who can clear the entry bar.
- A standardized qualifying exam. The USMLE gives any medical graduate worldwide a defined, merit-based path to prove eligibility, unlike countries with more discretionary credential recognition.
- The residency bottleneck limits entry, it doesn’t drive it. The number of Medicare-funded residency positions has been frozen by federal law since 1997. That cap gates how many international medical graduates (IMGs) can enter US practice each year, regardless of employer demand — it’s a big part of why the US doesn’t lead on share despite being the most financially attractive destination.
- Many “foreign-trained” doctors are American. A meaningful share of IMGs in the US Match are US citizens who trained abroad, often at Caribbean schools that exist specifically to serve applicants who didn’t get into a US medical school and plan to return and practice in the US.
What the 2026 Match shows
The 2026 NRMP Main Residency Match offered 44,344 positions and filled 41,482 (93.5%). Of the roughly 20,934 active US MD-senior applicants, about 1,361 went unmatched. International medical graduates — US-citizen and non-US-citizen combined — filled about 9,684 positions; nearly 3,000 of those were US-citizen IMGs. The non-US-citizen IMG match rate fell to a five-year low of 56.4% this cycle.
Canada is opening new routes for international doctors
Canada’s immigration department (IRCC) says it is making permanent residence simpler for doctors trained abroad. Its page lists three new measures:
- An Express Entry category for doctors with at least 1 year of full-time Canadian work experience as a medical doctor in the last 3 years.
- 5,000 federal spaces reserved in the Provincial Nominee Program, so provinces and territories can nominate doctors who have a job offer or a letter of support.
- Work permits processed in 14 days for doctors nominated by a province or territory, so they can work while they wait for permanent residence.
Family members can be included in the application. None of this replaces licensing: you still need your foreign credentials assessed and a licence from the medical regulator of the province or territory where you will practice. IRCC also cites the Canadian Institute for Health Information: 31% of Canada’s family physicians were trained abroad in 2024, a narrower measure than the share of all doctors in the table above.
Sources: OECD, International Migration Outlook 2025 ↗ · Statista, foreign-trained doctors by country ↗ · NRMP, 2026 Main Residency Match Results ↗ · American Hospital Association, GME funding fact sheet ↗ · IRCC, Live and work as a medical doctor in Canada ↗